The Paradoxical Behaviour of International Agricultural Commodity Prices
 
Oct 25th 2002

Recent evidence suggests of a new trend in the world prices of agricultural commodities. The price of US maize, which ruled at close to $85 a ton in April 2002, rose by 35 per cent, to $115, by September. The price of soybean jumped from $172 a ton in February to $220 by September, a rise of 28 per cent in seven months. US hard red winter wheat climbed from $123 a ton in May to $190 (a 54 per cent rise), while the soft red variety moved from $111 to $154 (a 39 per cent rise). Other commodities, like palm oil, coconut oil, cotton and cocoa, also recorded similar price increases (Charts 1 to 8). The instances of stagnation or decline in the prices of some commodities such as rice, groundnut and coffee (Charts 9 to 12), appear to be exceptions rather than defining the rule.
Chart 1 >> Chart 2 >> Chart 3 >> Chart 4 >>
Chart 5 >> Chart 6 >> Chart 7>> Chart 8 >>
Chart 9 >> Chart 10 >> Chart 11 >> Chart 12 >>

 
These observed increases of between 25 and 55 per cent in the prices of agricultural commodities within a relatively short period of time are remarkable because they point to a new tendency in world commodity markets. Till recently, most agricultural commodities had been experiencing long-run declines in their prices, starting from as far back as 1994 (Charts 13 to 16), which was the year when the Agreement on Agriculture (AoA), signed as part of the Uruguay Round of trade negotiations, began to be implemented. Advocates of the AoA had at that time argued that its implementation would result in a decline in developed country exports of agricultural commodities, and in an increase in the volume and prices paid for agricultural exports from developing countries. This was to result in substantial welfare gains for the developing countries. In practice, however, those promises remained unrealized as commodity prices underwent a long-run decline. But if the new tendency for prices to rise is sustained over the coming months, we could be witnessing a major breakthrough for commodity producers in world markets.
Chart 13 >> Chart 14 >> Chart 15 >> Chart 16 >>
 
While it is true that primary products as a whole accounted for just 30 per cent of developing country exports at the end of the 1990s as compared to more than 90 per cent in the mid-1950s, and that the share of non-fuel primary products (agricultural products and non-ferrous metals) in developing country exports fell by nearly one half, to 12 per cent, between the mid-1980s and late 1990s, agricultural exports are still important to a large number of countries. According to figures collated by the WTO, in the late 1960s, the large majority of developing countries, 103 out of 111 to be precise, were predominantly exporters of primary products. Between 1968–70 and 1998–2000, only 27 of these made the transition to being predominantly exporters of manufactured products and 76 remained primary product exporters, with a large number of them being dependent on agricultural exports. The prospect of buoyancy in agricultural prices is therefore of some significance to poor countries, especially in Africa.

 
 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next Page >>

Print this Page

 

Site optimised for 800 x 600 and above for Internet Explorer 5 and above
© MACROSCAN 2002