By
contrast, while Pay Commission awards are often presented
as purely political in nature, there is an important
economic consideration to their recommendations. In
an economy which is integrating with the global economy
especially at the level of the organised formal sector,
and where therefore salaries of certain professionals
in the private sector grow sharply even as other wages
stagnate in real terms, it is unrealistic to expect
the public sector to attract professionals without offering
at least comparable salaries. The explosive growth of
public sector salaries is therefore a reflection of
the economic liberalisation process, along with the
political factors that influence the outcome.
This point is not mentioned at all in the Report, which
instead castigates both increased wage bills and increased
spending on overt and covert subsidies as undesirable,
but does not see the rise in interest rates as another
way of subsidising rentiers. This underlying acceptance
of the basic economic strategy of the 1990s, which characterises
the EFC's whole approach, is problematic because it
also informs the attitude to how to resolve the problem
of fiscal imbalance, and leads to some suggestions which
are actually contradictory with others.
The fiscal context that the EFC describes is indeed
one marked by large imbalances. Chart 1 shows the fiscal
deficits of the Centre and States over the 1990s as
per cent of GDP (Old Series). It should be noted that
the figure for the Central fiscal deficit for 1999-2000
appears lower only because it excludes the States' share
of small savings, which were earlier included. The problem
is not with the size of these deficits so much as that
they have been increasingly composed of revenue deficit
rather than capital expenditure, as evident from Chart
2.
Chart
1 >> Click
to Enlarge
Chart
2 >> Click
to Enlarge
Here the deterioration of State finances appears to
have been faster than that of the Centre in the 1990s,
but this is not due to any worse performance in terms
of raising tax revenues. In fact, as shown in Chart
3, while tax buoyancy (per cent changes in tax receipts
divided by per cent changes in GDP) has declined for
both Centre and States over the decades, the decline
in the 1990s has been sharper for the Centre. This has
gone to the point where tax buoyancy for the Centre
has fallen below 1 in the 1990s. This is clearly the
result of falling tax rates, which despite the grandiose
claims of successive Finance Ministers, have not yielded
better compliance at all.
Chart
3 >> Click
to Enlarge
The EFC is clearly correct to argue that there should
be a much more systematic attempt to increase the tax-GDP
ratio, and it includes such an increase in its proposed
fiscal adjustment scenario which is detailed in Chart
4. Overall, the fiscal adjustment that the EFC asks
for over the next five years is quite substantial. As
Chart 5 illustrates, tax revenues of Centre and States
are to go up by nearly 3 percentage points of GDP, and
total revenue receipts by more than 3 percentage points.
Chart
4 >> Click
to Enlarge
Chart
5 >> Click
to Enlarge
Chart
6>> Click
to Enlarge
Meanwhile, revenue expenditure is also to be cut by
nearly 3 percentage points, bringing the revenue deficit
down from nearly 7 per cent of GDP at present to a highly
respectable 1 per cent. This would be associated with
an aggregate fiscal deficit of 6.5 per cent of GDP,
implying 5.5 per cent of GDP for capital expenditure
by both Centre and States. This is not particularly
ambitious but still substantially more than at present.
How is such a dramatic turnaround to be achieved ? One
mechanism is increasing tax revenues, of course. What
is interesting, however, is the EFC's expectation that
a very large part of this increased tax revenue (around
45 per cent of it) will come from enhanced tax effort
by the States. This is intriguing, given that the States'
ability to impose taxes is far more constrained than
that of the Central government, and that the Centre
has shown much poorer performance in the recent past
in this regard and therefore has much more scope for
improvement. |