These
boom-and-bust cycles naturally impact on developing
countries as a group far more adversely than on industrial
countries. After all, primary commodities accounted
for as much 42 per cent of all developing countries'
total merchandise exports in 1997, compared with only
19 per cent for the rich countries.
But still, even within developing countries, there are
two groups that have been the most affected by the most
recent boom-bust cycle. The first group consists of
the major oil exporting countries, that is, countries
where oil accounts for more than 50 percent of merchandise
exports. The other group is that of the non-oil exporting
countries of Sub-Saharan Africa, where non-oil primary
commodities, on average, make up 80 percent of exports.
For some countries, especially the least developed countries
of Sub-Saharan Africa, primary commodities account for
90 per cent of exports, and very often more than half
to two-thirds of export value is accounted for by one
single commodity. This naturally makes both the balance
of payments and the domestic real economy extremely
vulnerable to fluctuations in output and price of this
one good or group of goods.
Despite this dismal performance of primary commodities,
the overall terms of trade of all developing countries
does not show such a negative tendency, as will be clear
from Charts 4 and 5. This is actually because of the
degree of diversification out of primary into manufactured
exports that was achieved by certain developing countries,
such as the previously named "dragons" of
East and Southeast Asia as well as India and some Latin
American industrialisers. However, such trade and production
diversification is precisely what is now under threat
in some countries where it had proceeded quite substantially,
and is further constrained in less developed countries
where it had not gone very far.
Chart
4 >> Click
to Enlarge
Chart
5 >> Click
to Enlarge
In regions where no such process of export diversification
was evident, such as Sub-Saharan Africa, not only did
terms of trade deteriorate very substantially, but this
also had very large negative effects on real national
income. Chart 8 shows this, in terms of more than 10
per cent decline in terms of trade over just two years
1997 and 1998, and an effect of this alone on income
amounting to 2.7 per cent of GDP.
Chart
8 >> Click
to Enlarge
The reason all this is particularly worrying is that
primary commodity prices are not expected to recover
very much in the medium term. Charts 6 and 7 show one
set of projections by the World Bank for oil and non-oil
prices until 2001. What is interesting is that despite
the huge falls of the previous years, prices will not
increase much and are not even likely to regain their
levels of the mid-1990s. And this is notwithstanding
the much-vaunted "recovery" in East Asia which
is supposed to increase world demand for primary commodities
once again.
Chart
6 >> Click
to Enlarge
Chart
7 >> Click
to Enlarge
One reason for this is that in the current slump, except
in the case of oil, producers/traders of primary commodities
have been reluctant to reduce output to limit or reverse
the fall in price. rather they have chosen the option
of increasing the level of stocks held (aided by relatively
low interest rates) and this has meant a fairly large
overhang of inventories. Stocks of metals such as copper
and aluminium are at record levels; grain stockpiles
held by the major exporters have more than doubled over
just three years; sugar stocks are also reaching unprecedented
levels.
Thus low prices now reflect more than the usual cyclical
features. They are now characterised by severe overcapacity
in a situation of generally sluggish world demand for
such goods. It is clear that they are unlikely to bring
much joy to exporters in the medium term.
This is important, because this means the eradication
of the hopes which characterised the Uruguay Round of
trade talks, that more liberal trade would lead to higher
prices for developing country exporters of primary commodities.
Instead, what we witness is low prices and overproduction,
in a situation where competitive pressure and the need
to push out more exports have made these commodities
even greater sources of volatility and vulnerability
in domestic economies. |