|
|
|
|
Marginalized Groups and the Common Minimum
Program |
|
Jul
5th 2004, Sukhadeo Thorat * |
|
In
recognition of the unique problems of the Dalits,
Adiwasis and other religious minorities like the Muslims,
the Indian government has developed policies for their
economic, social and political empowerment. Dalits
and Adiwasis are the two largest groups, constituting
about 250 million in 2001 (about 167 million and 86
million respectively). Additionally, Muslims account
for about 12% the population. The deprivation of such
a vast mass of population is closely associated with
the process of exclusion and discrimination based
on group identity. The government has used a two-fold
strategy for the empowerment of the SC/ST (Scheduled
Caste/Scheduled Tribe) communities, which includes
(a) Anti-discrimination legal and protective measures,
and (b) Developmental or empowering measures. Anti-discrimination
measures include the enactment of the Anti-Untouchability
Act of 1955, and the Schedule Caste/Tribe Prevention
of Atrocities Act,1989. Reservations in government
services and political bodies also fall under the
purview of protective measures. The reservation policy
is confined to the public sector; and the private
sector wherein more than 90% of the SC/ST workers
are engaged remains unprotected. The focus of the
government's 'general programmes' therefore has been
on the educational, social and economic empowerment
of the SC/STs and on improving the private ownership
of fixed capital assets (land and non-land), human
resources, and on improving access to basic services
like housing, health, drinking water, electricity
etc.
The
goal of the government's interventionist policy has
thus been focusing on the improvement of levels of
human indicators of the SC/ST and on bringing them
at par with other non-scheduled groups. The pertinent
question therefore is where do the marginalized groups
stand today? Though there has been some improvement
in certain spheres and despite some positive changes,
the standard of living for the marginalized communities
has not improved. In 2000, close to 40% of the SC
and 48% of ST were poor as compared with 20% among
others in rural areas. About 36% of SC/ST remained
poor in urban areas as against 20% for others. The
poverty level of wage labour among the SC/ST was also
particularly high, varying between 46% and 60% in
the rural and urban areas respectively. In urban areas,
the ratio of poor among casual labourers was also
high, 58% for SC, 64% for ST and 45% for non-scheduled
population. Among the Muslims, the percentage of poor
was about 30% compared to 21% for other religions
groups. Similarly, the incidence of poverty in urban
areas was higher among the Muslims (36.66% compared
to 23% all India average).
What (Minimum) Needs to be Done?
The reasons for the high incidences of poverty and
deprivation among the marginalized social groups are
to be found in their continuing lack of access to
income-earning capital assets, (agricultural land
and non-land assets), heavy dependence on wage employment,
high unemployment, low education and other factors.
Therefore, there is a need to focus on policies to
improve the ownership of income-earning capital assets
(agriculture land, and non-land assets), employment,
human resource & health situation, and prevention
of discrimination to ensure fair participation of
the marginalized community in the private and the
pubic sectors.
Active Role of the State in Planning
It is necessary to recognize that for the vast majority
of the discriminated groups, State intervention is
crucial and necessary. Similarly, the use of economic
and social planning as an instrument of planned development
is equally necessary. Economic discrimination, in
general and market discrimination in particular, is
a serious market failure. Thus, planned State intervention
to ensure fair access and participation in social
and economic development in the country is necessary.
Improved Access to Agricultural Land
The problem of landlessness is more serious among
the SC as compared to the ST and the Muslims, as 70%
of the SC rural households are landless and near landless
(owning less than 1 acre). Government record on land
redistribution has been quite disappointing. So far,
only 2% of the total cultivable land has been distributed
under the ceiling to landless and the share goes up
marginally to 10% if we include government land. Only
18 lakh acres of land have been distributed so far
to 18.5 lakh SC beneficiaries with 0.977 acre per
beneficiary. Therefore, it is a cause for concern
that a large section of SC households remain without
viable land even today.
Therefore, the CMP should include serious land reform
measures to distribute minimum land to landless households.
For this purpose, the Government should clear the
cultivable wasteland and other lands, including land
under ceiling and develop these large tracts of land
through employment programs and thus, create a 'Common
pool of State land' free from litigation by private
parties and redistribute it to the Scheduled Castes
and others. As the present system failed to give possession
of even legally distributed land to the SCs and STs
due to their extremely powerless position in village
societies, a special organization at the Centre and
in the States should be set up for the purpose of
acquiring, developing and distribution of government
land and land under ceiling.
For example, there are large tracts of customary lands
whose rights were given to SCs, but which were encroached
by the high caste landlords. These lands include Mahar
Vatan land in Maharashtra, Panchami land in Tamilnadu,
and Depressed Caste land in A.P. The government through
the new organization should release these lands from
the encroachers and hand them to their legitimate
owners.
Improved Access to Capital
The poverty level among the SC and ST cultivators
is 30% and 40% respectively, which is much higher
compared with non-scheduled cultivators (18%). Similarly,
the poverty incidences of those in business is very
high 33% for SC and 41% for ST compared with only
21% among non-scheduled businesses. The viability
and productivity of self-employed households need
to be improved by providing adequate capital, information,
technology and access to markets. It is a pity that
though the STs do own some land, they lack the relevant
technological inputs to improve the productivity of
their agriculture. The capital at the disposable of
SC/ST Finance Corporation at the Centre and in the
States, therefore, needs to be increased so as to
meet the capital requirements of these groups. Under
the impact of liberalization regime, even the priority
lending of 10% by commercial banks to the weaker sections
has been reduced to 6%. This trend too needs to be
reversed.
Improved Employment
in Public and Private Sectors
Public Employment
In 2000, about 61% of rural and urban SC households
and about half of ST households were wage labourers,
and poverty levels among them were about 46% for SC
and 61% for ST households respectively. The poverty
levels among casual labourers' households were as
high as 58% and 64% in urban areas for SC and ST respectively.
The unemployment rates were also high among these
two groups as compared with non-scheduled groups.
There is a need to review and strengthen employment
guarantee schemes both in rural and urban areas, particularly
in drought-prone and poverty-ridden areas. Rural infrastructure
and other productive capital assets can be generated
through large-scale employment programmes. This will
serve the duel purpose of reducing poverty and ensuring
economic growth through improvement in the stock of
capital assets and infrastructure.
Private Sector Employment
Due to privatization, the subsequent withdrawal of
the State and the decline in government and public
employment, the employment of SC/ST under reservation
has declined quite significantly. Therefore, reservation
should continue in the undertakings that have been
privatized during the 1990s under the policy of privatization.
Reservation in the Private Sector
The CMP has promised to undertake necessary steps
to incorporate reservation in the private sector.
Given the prevalence of significant discrimination
in employment in the private sector, the formulation
of a reservation policy is necessary to ensure fair
access to the discriminated groups. For this purpose,
a Committee at the Central Government level should
be set up to formulate the policy of reservation in
the private sector.
Firstly, the government should enact the 'Equal Opportunity
Act' of which 'Equal Employment Opportunity Act' should
be a part, so that legal provisions are in place.
Secondly, legislation should be passed by the Central
government for reservation both for private and public
sector, to ensure fair access to the discriminated
groups like SC and ST in private employment.
Thirdly, the 'Equal Opportunity Act' and reservation
measures should be applicable not only to employment
in private sector but be extended to other areas or
markets like private capital market, product and consumer
market etc.
Fourthly, 'Equal Opportunity Act and Reservation should
be applicable to private education. 'Equal Opportunity
Act' is also necessary for private housing sector
to prevent discrimination in the housing markets.
Fifthly, reservation should be applicable in government
contracts given to private contractors for construction
and a number of other dealings and also in purchase
of goods by the State. Certain quotas should be fixed
for SC/ST contractors as they face discrimination
in the sale of some consumer goods due to notions
of purity and pollution.
Lastly, an 'Affirmative Action Policy' of some sort
should be envisaged for multinational companies in
the framework of UN provisions. Some countries have
taken initiative in this respect under the provisions
of the Global Compact and other UN Equal Employment
Opportunity provisions.
Education and Human Resource Development
Firstly, lower literacy/level of education and the
continual discrimination of SC/STs in educational
institutions pose a major problem. The government
should take a second look at the Education Policy
and develop major programmes for strengthening the
public education system in villages and cities on
a much larger scale than today. There is a necessity
to reallocate government resources for education and
vocational training. For millions of poor students
located in rural areas, the loan schemes do not work.
We should develop an affordable, uniform and better
quality public educational system up to the university
level. Public education system is our strength and
needs to be further strengthened. Promotion of such
private education systems that creates inequality
and hierarchy should be discouraged. In this regard,
we may draw some lessons from Sweden, where only 3%
of educational institutions are privately managed,
but their syllabus, tuition structure and infrastructure
facilities are similar to that of public education
institutions. The gradation and hierarchy that we
are introducing in the private sector at rapid rate
should be discouraged and public education system
should be strengthened in terms of infrastructure,
quality of teacher and other facilities.
Vocational training should be made part of the normal
education system. In this respect, the system of vocational
education developed by Germany could be tried in India.
Secondly, there is hardly any financial support to
SC/ST students at higher levels of education and research.
The University Grants Commission should institute
a special fellowship scheme for these groups. The
UGC had earlier introduced a special fellowship for
SC/ST Ph.D. students from which many students had
benefited. This scheme too should be reviewed.
Public Health System
The public health system in rural areas has also been
by and large neglected. Therefore, the primary health
system for rural areas and public health system in
urban areas must be revived and more funds should
be allocated for the same
Food Security Programs
The public distribution system should also be revived
and strengthened. In distributing Fair Price Shops
in villages, priority should be given to the SC/ST
female and male groups, as a number of studies have
pointed out that they are discriminated upon in the
Public Distribution System and in Mid-day Meal schemes.
Untouchability and Discrimination
The practice of untouchability and the large number
of atrocities inflicted on Dalits continue even today
mainly because of hidden prejudices and neglect on
the part of officials responsible for the implementation
of Special Legislations; i.e. the Protection of Civil
Rights Act (PCRA) and the Prevention of Atrocities
Act (POA). The Government should make a meaningful
intervention in this regard so as to mitigate the
sufferings of Dalits due to practice of untouchability
and atrocities inflicted upon them and should also
treat this matter on a priority basis to ensure that
the officials and the civil society at large are sensitized
on this issue.
The
government should also establish a special department
to continue the social reform process and to educate
the masses on the evils of untouchability and caste
discrimination on the pattern of Tamil Nadu government.
The law by itself often does not help to remove the
practice of untouchability, unless there is change
in the attitude and behaviour of high castes. So there
is a need to have a program of social and moral education
of high caste individuals in the society.
|
|
*
Sukhadeo Thorat is Professor of Economics, Centre for
the Study of Regional Development, Jawaharlal Nehru
University, New Delhi & Director, Indian Institute
of Dalit Studies, Delhi. |
|
|
|
|
|
|